Welcome to Opeeka’s Person-Centered Intelligence Solution (P-CIS) Training Hub. We have designed this training with multiple goals in mind.
Within this training hub, you will find text, videos, and learning tasks to help you explore and become familiar with the various modules within P-CIS. Below you will see multiple training sections.
As you take this training, we ask that you complete the following for each section below:
Welcome to this tutorial on Navigation and the Main Dashboard in P-CIS.
I’ll be introducing you to the basic structure and navigation tools in P-CIS. Then we will walk through each widget, table, and graph you’ll see in the Main Dashboard, which will be your view each time you log into P-CIS.
View Video ScriptClose Video Script
Welcome to this tutorial on Navigation and the Main Dashboard in P-CIS.
I’ll be introducing you to the basic structure and navigation tools in P-CIS. Then we will walk through each widget, table, and graph you’ll see in the Main Dashboard, which will be your view each time you log into P-CIS.
The Upper Pane Controls are found at the top of the page, and remain there throughout the various modules you might be working in.
The Navigation Ribbon is on the left and is also always visible. As a helper, you will see three options here, Dashboard, People, and Insights. A supervisor, will also see Questionnaires and Settings. Training on these additional modules is included in the P-CIS Supervisor training.
Let’s take a closer look now at the Main Dashboard.
From the Main Dashboard you can see at a glance how many people you are helping, what their top needs and strengths are, progress made on needs and strengths items, and recent notifications.
This people helping widget shows a count of how many people you are helping.
Top Needs Summary table: The Top Needs Summary Table identifies the top needs of focus for the people you are helping. So of the number of people you are helping, how many have been or are being helped with each item, with the list ordered from greatest number being helped to the fewest. An item is an area of life or well-being which was identified through a question on a questionnaire assessment.
View All: To see a complete list of the needs for focus that make up the table and the pie, I can click “View All”, which will take me to the Needs Summary page.
The Needs Summary will update with every assessment that is submitted, so the information here will always be up to date, reflecting the real and current needs of the population you’re helping.
Below the Top Needs Summary is the Top Strengths summary. These two summary sections mirror each other.
Top Strengths Summary Table: The Top Strengths Summary table identifies all of the top strengths to build which were identified for the people you are helping. So, of the number of people you are helping, how many were ever indicated as needing help with building each strength, with the list ordered from greatest number indicated to the fewest.
View All: To see a complete list of the strengths to build that make up the table and the pie, I can click “View All”, which will take me to the Strengths Summary page. From here I can sort, filter, and navigate using the numbers and arrows at the bottom where there are multiple pages.
Pattern and Trends: Again, these pie graphs here in the dashboard provide information on the number of items you are helping people with, which translates to the level of time and effort needed. Another good pattern to keep an eye on is the difference between the number of needs for focus as compared to the number of strengths to build. A collaboration that is strengths focused will see that reflected here, with a balance and a lean towards strengths building.
To the left we see the notifications table. This shows your most recent remind and alert notifications for people you are helping.
The remind notifications are not yet ready to test, but they will be soon, so let’s review briefly.
Table Options:
The Helpers table will be covered in the supervisors training. Users with a Helper role will just see themselves here.
Finally, we see a list of people you are helping. Anyone you are helping will show in this table, whether you are a primary or secondary helper.
Table Options:
People Summary Table:
That brings us to the end of our tutorial on the Navigation and Main Dashboard in P-CIS. Thank you for your time. Please continue to the next tab in the training hub to complete the learning tasks for this section.
Perform the tasks in the lists below and check them off as you complete them for each section.
On a sheet of paper answer these questions below regarding the Dashboard and check them off as you go.
View Video ScriptClose Video Script
The People module is where profile and assessment information is held for each person in P-CIS. In the people module, you will have access to view any person you are a helper for. If you are a supervisor, you will have access to view anyone that’s being helped by someone you’re supervising as well.
You can use the navigation ribbon at the left to access the people module at any time.
You will see a grid showing all of the people you are helping. 20 people will show at one time. If you are helping more than that many people, use the navigation arrows below the table to view additional people.
For each person you are helping, you will see the following information listed in the grid:
From this table, you can click on a person’s name to go to their profile page.
On the profile page, you will see more information about that person, including contact information, personal information, and information on their current and past supports, helpers, and collaborations.
The person’s information may be linked to an EHR and updated from that integration as well.
When you first view the profile, only the contact info window will be expanded. You can expand each section by clicking the arrow button on the right. If you have read/write access in the system, you can make edits to a person’s profile by clicking “Edit Person”.
For example if a person moves and you need to change their address or telephone number, you can do that here. If support people or their contact information changes, you can update that here. And if their helper or collaboration status changes you can change it here.
The person’s information may be linked to an EHR and updated from that integration as well.
A few things to note in the Profile section:
The red asterisks here signal that this is a required field. Your agency may have additional requirements beyond what’s minimally required in P-CIS. In P-CIS, each person must have their first name, last name, email, and phone number. Their address is optional information. Each person must have a date of birth, identified gender, and race/ethnicity.
A person can have multiple race/ethnicities identified in the system. Use the plus icon here to add more than one race/ethnicity.
Also in the personal info section is an option to add an identifier. If you add an identifier, such as a behavioral health id or Medicaid id, you must fill in both ID fields, indicating the Identifier Type, as well as the identifier itself. You must choose the ID type first, for example Medicaid ID here, and then you will be able to enter the person’s Medicaid ID.
A support may include caregivers, family members, natural supports, and other non-paid collaboration team members. Adding a support here is optional, but when there is a support listed, there must be a first and last name, phone number, email, relationship and start date. If you click “Add New” by accident, and there is no new support to add, you can delete the section by clicking here, on the red icon.
For both the person and the supports, it is important that the contact information is up to date. If there is an indication of need that requires a time sensitive response, it is imperative that the information is at hand when you need it. For example, if you email a support person an assessment to complete for a person and those scores come back indicating immediate follow-up necessary for the person you are helping, it is important that you have their most up to date contact information at hand.
Finally, each person must have a lead helper. There may be multiple people helping the person, but one and only one helper must be identified as the lead in the system. The start date indicates the beginning of a helper’s work with the person, and end date marks the end of their work with the person.
Similarly, a person may be participating in more than one collaboration, but one and only one must be identified as their primary collaboration. A collaboration can identify the start and end dates of a program, an evidence-based practice, a care modality or an episode of care, depending on the level of information that is tracked. The start date indicates the beginning of the person’s time in the collaboration, and the end date marks the end (their discharge or transition to different care).
Using Princess Cinderella as an example again, we see that she has complete contact information, and all required personal information, along with some additional fields filled out, including her sexual orientation and preferred language. We see both a current and a past support person listed. Her current helper is Toto. He is her only helper so he is the lead helper by default. He has been her helper since she started the school based behavioral therapy collaboration. And we can see here that she was in another collaboration, crisis care support, for the month of July in 2019.
Past supports, helpers, and collaborations are moved to a “Past” designation when they are given an end date. Past Collaborations and Helpers are not deleted, but instead are kept as “Past” so that historic information is preserved.
If you make an error when you are adding information about supports, helpers, and collaborations, you can cancel by clicking the cancel button here in the bottom right. But once the person’s profile has been saved, the only way to correct a mistake related to support, helper, or collaboration information is to contact your Org Admin. Only they can fix that error in the system for you.
Finally, click “Save” to save any changes or additions you have made.
The next tab is the Questionnaires tab. Here you will see all questionnaires that have ever been started or completed for the person. Also, you can see a list of questionnaires assigned to any collaboration in which the person is enrolled.
So for example, Cinderella is enrolled in the school based behavioral therapy collaboration. That collaboration has 1 questionnaire assigned to it, the CANS for Standard Care. Any person enrolled in that collaboration will be assigned that questionnaire. The other questionnaire listed may be a questionnaire from the other collaboration she participated in, or it may be a questionnaire that Toto decided would be helpful for her.
New Questionnaires can be added using the “Add Questionnaire” button at the top right as needed.
Questionnaires are identified and distinguished by several characteristics. In the summary dashboard, as we see here, there may be multiple questionnaires for the same instrument. Use the following identifiers to determine which questionnaire you should choose.
Once you click on a questionnaire from the list, you can:
If you have Read/Write access, you can:
The next section of this training includes further training on the Questionnaire Module and completing assessments.
The following tab is the notifications tab. Notifications are not yet ready for testing, but when they are, you will see details for the two different types of notifications, Remind notifications and alert notifications.
Remind notifications include upcoming, due or overdue questionnaires. Alert notifications include any notifications which were generated based on threshold responses on questions or sets of questions.
The final section is the Reports. The reports seen in this section are for the person you are viewing, and are based on all assessments that have been submitted for the person. So here we see reports for Cinderella based on the assessments held in the Questionnaires tab.
When you first view this tab, reports will show using default settings. Lifetime, and Communimetric (if available). You can customize the reports, filtering down which assessments will be included, using the Select Report Filters:
The first filter is the Collaboration filter. To view reports that reflect all assessments, regardless of collaboration participation start and end dates, select “Lifetime”. To view reports that reflect only assessments completed within the timeframe of a collaboration, use the dropdown to select the name of the Collaboration.
The next filter is the Voice Type filter. Of the assessments available for the collaboration you chose, this filter will show which voice types are available. This may be the person themselves, if they filled out an assessment for themselves. This may be a helper or support person, if they filled out an assessment with their voice. Or this may be communimetric, representing an agreed upon consensus between all team members after communicating.
Next, you will see a list of available questionnaires, based on your filters.
If we choose School Based Behavioral Therapy and Communimetric, we see that we can choose from either of the two questionnaires.
The first report you will see is the Story Map which takes information from the assessment and puts it into a format that was designed to support activities such as creating case plans or intervention plans.
The Story Map here is based on the scores from the person’s assessments. You can choose which assessment using the drop down menu here.
Hmm. I see only one available assessment for Cinderella. I know she had more than that. Let’s see how the filters are affecting what’s available. Going back to the Questionnaire tab, I select the CANS standard care questionnaire and scroll down. Okay. So Cinderella has had two assessments completed, but they have different voie types. The first was communimetric and the second was only Princess Cinderella’s voice.
Let’s look at what assessments were completed with the other questionnaire. Here we see four assessments, completed over the course of a month, all from the communimetric voice. Let’s update our filters in the report tab to see this information in report format.
We go back to the Report tab, this time choosing Lifetime, to include all questionnaires, choosing communimetric as the voice type, and choosing the CANS for Intensive Care questionnaire.
Now we see 4 options, 4 time points we can view in the Story Map. The last assessment is selected by default so we’ll look at that one.
On the left side we see Underlying Items, this is where we see any traumas or exposures that the person has experienced. So we see that Cinderella has experienced several traumas including disruptions in caregiving, emotional abuse, neglect, traumatic grief, and witness to family violence. Most underlying items don’t change over time, but the information is here to inform any planning we do. On the right, we see a list of Needs in the Background. We see Anxiety , Eating Disturbances, Independent Living Skills, Intimate Relationships , Job Functioning , Recreational , School Attendance , Sleep , Social Functioning and Transportation needs. According to Cinderella’s scores on these items, they are not top priority needs that need a lot of energy or focus, but they are here to keep in mind. In the middle, we see our Action Items. On the left, we see all the Needs for Focus. We see attachment difficulties, family living situation, and educational attainment. These were all Needs for focus at the time this questionnaire was filled out. On the right we see a list of Strengths to Build or Strengths that are Present. This is a long list, including strengths indicated to build as well as strengths that are present, that may be beneficial for use in planning.
To further customize this story map around the client, an optional feature allows you to rearrange the priority of needs for focus. Let’s say for Cinderella, our top priority is Living Situation and after that family. We can easily rearrange our priorities in the story map to match the priorities we’ve set with Cinderella in our planning time with her. Click “Save Priority” here to save the priority you’ve set.
Below the Story Map table is a Narrative. This is a text representation of the table above, is updated any time the table is updated, and can be copied and pasted for use in approved locations, such as case plan notes or intervention plans.
After the Story Map Report tab, we see the Item Detail Report. The Item Detail Report allows you to select any question item from the assessment and see the score over time. For example, we can take a closer look at the Traumatic stress symptoms items, Adjustment to Trauma, and here we see scores on that item over time, along with any notes that were entered for the item.
We are working on the Family Report and it will be available soon.
Choose a person from the list of people you’re helping. Find her:
For that person:
For the Story Map Report: Select the questionnaire with that person’s most recent assessment. View the most recent assessment completed in the Story Map.
For the Item Detail Report: Select the CANS for Intensive Care Questionnaire. Expand the Traumatic Stress Symptoms section and Select the Adjustment to Trauma Item.
The P-CIS Questionnaire module makes data useful and accessible, to support treatment and intervention planning for staff and supervisors. P-CIS can be used with nearly any assessment in human services practice.
The Questionnaire module in P-CIS gives you insights at a glance from a graph of scores over time, to status icons, to color coded scores.
View Video ScriptClose Video Script
The P-CIS Questionnaire module makes data useful and accessible, to support treatment and intervention planning for staff and supervisors. P-CIS can be used with nearly any assessment in human services practice.
The Questionnaire module in P-CIS gives you insights at a glance from a graph of scores over time, to status icons, to color coded scores.
The first thing you will see under the questionnaire tab is a summary dashboard of all questionnaires that have ever been implemented for the person as well as any questionnaire that is assigned to any of the current collaborations in which the person is participating.
Questionnaire Characteristics:
Questionnaires are identified and distinguished by several characteristics. In the questionnaires table you may see multiple questionnaires for the same instrument. Use the following identifiers to determine which questionnaire you should choose.
Add Questionnaire: If there are no questionnaires ever implemented or currently assigned, or if you need to add a new questionnaire that is not currently listed in the table, click “Add Questionnaire”. You will see a pop up box listing any questionnaire associated with your agency. When you find the questionnaire you need, select and click “Add”. Now you will see the questionnaire added to the list in the questionnaire table.
In the Questionnaire module, you can view Historic Questionnaire Data for any questionnaire that has ever been implemented for a person.
Once you’ve selected a Questionnaire from the table, scroll down. You will see the Instrument Name and Questionnaire Name, along with two filter options, Collaboration and Voice Type.
Collaboration: The first filter, Collaboration, will be set to “Lifetime” by default. “Lifetime” includes all questionnaires assessments started and completed for the person, regardless of the collaboration they were in at the time. You can filter down to just the questionnaires started and completed for the person during a specified collaboration time frame by using the drop down filter, which lists both collaboration name and start and end dates.
Voice Type: The second filter is for voice type. The voice identifies whose perspective and opinion the assessment is completed from. You can leave the voice filter at “View All” to see all assessments completed for the questionnaire or use the voice filter to see only assessments completed with a specified voice.
Once you have made your filter selections, click “Expand All” here on the right, and as you scroll down you will see past assessment scores reflected first in a graph then a table.
The graph shows a count of item types over time across assessments, ordered from left to right chronologically. You can adjust the visualization in real time using the toggles on the left. The icons used here are used throughout the module to highlight items of interest.
Assessment Information: Next we see supporting information for the assessment.
So you can save the assessment and come back to it, and it will show as In Progress. And when you submit it, it’s locked until it’s either approved or returned.
Following the supporting information for the Assessment are the assessment scores themselves.
Assessment scores are grouped by category at first, providing a sum of scores for each category. When you expand a category, you will see individual item scores within the category.
Color Coded Scores: With the categories expanded, you can see that the score boxes are color coded, to draw attention to highest scores over time. Here, the darker the box the higher the need. These colors are customized for each questionnaire when it is calibrated in P-CIS and are specific to your agency preferences.
For Example: So if we scroll through Cinderella’s assessments, we see that she has multiple traumatic/ adverse childhood experiences present. We won’t see aces change over time. And then we see pretty easily where Cinderella feels she has made progress, here in the area of traumatic grief, and the strength areas of family, community life, and relationship permanence. And so on.
Status Icons: You’ll notice the status icons that were at the top, in the graph, appear to the left of the assessments here. By default, these icons are based on the most recent assessment. If you’d like to see icons for a different assessment, at the top of the assessment, click the time that you’d like to see. The icons show which items have been indicated as a need for focus, a need in the background, a strength to build, a strength to use, or an underlying item.
For Example: We see here that Cinderella’s aces have all been indicated as underlying items, so we see the shield. As of her latest assessment, she has no indication of need related to traumatic stress symptoms. All of the child strength items have been indicated as strengths to use. There’s Cinderella’s optimism shining through. She has lots of strengths and she’s ready to use them.
This is a good example of where it’s helpful sometimes to have all the assessments in view, and where sometimes it may be important to have a single voice only. So here, with only the two assessments present, it’s easy to keep in mind the context. The first assessment is the group communimetric assessment at the beginning of her School-Based Behavioral Therapy collaboration. The second is Cinderella’s voice only, about six months later. You can imagine, if you had 6-8 assessments here, without filtering down the voice it could be hard to keep context straight and make sure you’re comparing apples to apples.
Item Descriptions: Speaking of keeping things straight. If you need a refresher on any item, let’s say we forget what recreation means, we can expand each item to see its description and rating definitions.
If you have read/write permission in the system, you can add assessments for the person.
First, confirm that you have selected the appropriate Questionnaire. Take a look at the previous assessments added. Then click “Add” to start a new assessment. A pop up window will ask you for the following information.
Next, you’ll choose how to activate the assessment by choosing one of the following options:
Once an assessment has been activated, I can start adding assessment scores using one or all of the following options:
Items are grouped in categories. Click “Expand All” to view all categories at once. Or use the arrows to expand one category at a time.
As you enter scores, you will notice status icons appear on the left hand side.
Icons appear based on the item type and item score. Icon defaults are based on rules set by the Org Admin and are designed so the user can enter information as quickly as possible, and the behavior of how that information will be handled is tailored to the collaboration’s logic model (e.g., program goals).
In this case, we can see that where the score is 2 or 3, there is a hand for that item, showing this is a need for focus. Where the score is 1, there is a pin, showing this is a need, but it’s a background need, something to keep in mind. And where the score is 0, there is no icon.
In the strengths domain it’s similar, with a barbell for scores of 2 or 3, showing this is a strength to build, and an arm for scores of 0 to show the strength is present.
Optional Alternate Icons: As we scroll down, we see that most items have two icons visible when the assessment is in edit mode, one dark and one light. The darker icon is the one that’s selected, and the lighter icon is the alternate available. So you can choose to change the status of an icon. These defaults are set up by the agency ahead of time, and again these are optional.
For Example: But let’s say in Cinderella’s case, attachment difficulties have improved, and the improvement in her score has dropped the item below the threshold for “needs for focus”, and has moved the item to a background need. But the team feels like we need to keep momentum going in that area, and that it needs to remain a focus in our treatment planning. I can choose to override the default, and instead select the hand. This identifies this item as a need for focus here in the questionnaire module, in the graph at the top, and in the story map report. So the score remains true, but the module and story map adjust to support the specific work I’m doing with Cinderella.
Underlying items are a little different. All items which have been identified as an underlying item in the questionnaire definition, will display an icon that looks like a shield ( ) when the response rises above the threshold set within the questionnaire template. In this example, the icon appears for any underlying item which has a score of 1, 2, or 3.
There are a couple additional options available to you here in the questionnaire module. Both can be accessed by expanding the item detail.
Assessment Status: At any point in filling out the assessment, you can scroll down to the bottom and cancel. You can save it at any point and come back to it. And when you are ready, you can submit the assessment. When an assessment is submitted, it will update your dashboard and the reports and insights in P-CIS, and it will be sent to whoever is listed in P-CIS as your reviewer. At that point, you cannot make any further changes. However, it will not become final until your reviewer approves it. If your reviewer returns the assessment, it will be sent back to you and have a status of “Returned”. At that point, you can again make adjustments. Once the assessment is approved, it is final.
That brings us to the end of our tutorial on the Questionnaire Module in P-CIS. Thank you for your time. Please continue to the next tab in the training hub to complete the learning tasks for this section.
Choose a person that’s currently being helped and is in a Collaboration. Using the CANS for Standard Care questionnaire, create a new CANS assessment for that person. If that person has one or more assessments already, choose a date later than the last assessment shown. Click Save
View Video ScriptClose Video Script
Hi, I am Kate and I am here to walk you through some of the Insights on P-CIS. This video will cover the Waterfall of Items Presented, Discovered and Resolved Dashboard – or the Waterfall Dashboard for short.
Let’s start here, where I am logged into Person-Centered Intelligence Solution (P-CIS) as a Helper. On the main dashboard I can see that I am helping 17 people. If I move to the People Module and sort by the Assessed column, we can see that there are nine people who have assessments. We can see how many time these people have been assessed.. There are a total of 43 assessments represented here is we add up this column. I want to point out that Toto is helping 16 youth and one family, the Addams family. The one family has been assessed with the CHAPS, and all youth have been assessed with the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths (CANS). I also want to point out that assessments are only counted in this view if they are part of open collaborations.
Now I can move over to Insights Module, and we can see these same 17 people represented here. Now even though we’re helping 17 people only nine people have been assessed. So we can see here that there are nine people assessed here. The Insights are not representing the remainder of folks because they have not yet been assessed.
You can see the dynamic filters for the dashboard here. By default, collaborations the filters will be set to Lifetime. Meaning it’s going to represent all care over the lifetime of for a person regardless of which collaboration they’re in. So while Toto may have 17 people there’s 35 collaborations represented – with 17 of those being lifetime collaborations and the remainder being specific collaborations that the person is engaged in or was engaged in. When you make a selection from the filters, the dashboard will update to show all the people who match those filters. The filter criteria selected show at the top. When you want to remove a selection, you can do that by selecting the “X” next to the selected criteria. When you want to reset the filters back to their default, you can do that by selecting “Reset Filters” here.
There’s been a total of 43 assessments. So this dashboard represents nine people across 43 assessments. The people module will only count assessments which are part of an ongoing collaboration. However, in insights, we can see assessments across a lifetime of collaborations for people Toto is helping. Therefore, Insights will always represent the same or more assessments than we see in the People Module.
Then this People Represented table represents the nine people by race/ethnicity and gender. So Toto is helping two who are male with other race, two who are female and white and so forth. And we can see that for these nine people, this waterfall chart here identifies the number of Needs for focus, strengths to build and underlying areas.
Let’s limit the view to one assessment, the CANS. So that would be eight youth across 40 CANS now, removing the one Addams family. Let’s also limit our view to just the person’s needs and their support’s or caregiver’s needs.
Looking at the Waterfall chart, now I’m seeing that on average there were 15 needs identified on a first assessment. For the CANS, these represent actionable needs. On average, we discover 3 additional needs on subsequent assessments for a total of 18 needs identified on average per youth. In the table below, I can see that most often runaway was found on the first assessment. So we’re seeing that runaway was found in 87.5% of the kids that were assessed. School attendance, sleep, judgment, school achievement, and impulsivity were the next most common needs. So these are the most common needs that Toto is identifying initially on the very first assessment.
What we’re finding though, is that after the first assessment three additional needs on average are coming up for children/youth that Toto serves. If we want to know what those are most commonly, we sort by Discovered. We see that non-suicidal self injury is a need for one person, and that it was discovered for that person. We did find this it wasn’t known at first but that it was found afterwards and that makes sense because that’s something that’s sometimes hidden under clothing and revealed after building a trusting relationship. Next we see that six youth were identified to have depression needs but half of the time – so for three of those youth – we’re finding the depression needs after the first assessment. We’re also finding anxiety after the first assessment. So this percentage here represents of those that Toto ever identified to have the need, how often was it discovered after the first assessment.
So for depression and anxiety which are internalizing behaviors, Toto is discovering these after first assessment. So as we saw Toto is identifying a lot of externalizing behaviors up front, but he is also finding internalizing behaviors after the first assessment. So this may be an indicator that that he is building a trusting relationships with youth and they’re revealing their inner thoughts to him. It could also could be an indicator that he might want to spend more time up front really being open to identifying internalizing behaviors. This could be an opportunity for coaching for Toto.
So we see that Toto identified a total of 18 needs for focus for children/youth or their supports, and so if we sort by Ever we can look at what those are most commonly. Seven of eight assessed had sleep, judgment, school attendance, school achievement, and runaway. And 6 had depression, anxiety, family needs, intentional misbehavior, anger control and impulsivity. We’re seeing eating disturbance as a need for five along the oppositional Behavior, School Behavior, social functioning living situation. Etc. So you can see the how often we’re finding needs ever, whether they we found them on the first assessment or we discovered them after the first assessment on average.
Now and the remainder of the waterfall were coming back down because we’re looking at things that have already been addressed or resolved. So we have 10 needs per youth/child on average that have been addressed and eight remaining. So if I want to see what’s been addressed most often, I can sort by the Resolved column here, and we can see that five out of eight of those children/youth had runaway and school attendance resolved. So Toto and his team are doing really good at helping those kids get stably back into school and stably back into a setting where they’re not running. Toto’s team is also helping improve the youth’s sleep and they are working to improve family functioning, intentional misbehavior and impulsivity.
Now if we want to see where we’re not doing as well we can scroll down here and see that for the six kids who had anxiety that have only resolved it for one. So we’re only at 16.7% here. So that’s where we’re maybe not spending as much time for addressing needs of anxiety, social functioning, recreation. Those are more often left unresolved. And if we want to see what are the number of unresolved most often we can sort here and we can see for five kiddos that school achievement and anxiety are top ones unresolved with judgment and social functioning following.
So this is helping us identify when Toto and his team are skilled at resolving needs as well as what needs are most often unresolved. We’re seeing that anxiety often discovered after the first and we’re also not seeing it resolved as often. So this might be an opportunity for coaching for Toto and his care team about how to address anxiety with the youth.
We have been looking at Needs areas. Now if I want to focus my insights on Strengths, I can adjust the filters. I’m going to unselect this the needs and I’m going to look at the person’s strengths as well as the support resources for the caregivers.
So we’ve got our eight kiddos again this time. We’re focusing on strengths and what we can see here is that we identified six strengths to build on average on the first assessment. We didn’t identify any additional strengths at on the subsequent assessments, which is fairly typical. We have identified them up front. We have built on average two strengths and we are still working on building four additional strengths.
We can skip right over to ever since ever is going to be the same as first and we can see that Toto is most often helping with optimism followed by interpersonal and relationship permanence. Now if we look at our resolved column, here’s where we can see how he’s doing with his youth. So for the seven youth, we’ve identified to work on optimism, he has helped build optimism for two. And that’s about 28%. Toto is doing much better with interpersonal at two-thirds of those identified. Perhaps not as well with cultural stress and with a talents and interests. So these are areas where Toto could maybe focus on building more strengths for youth. And again, this may be a coaching opportunity for Toto.
So those are the waterfall charts in the items, the next dashboard here will identify the items by their categories. So in the cans those are often called domains. But in other assessments they could be called a categories. Let’s remove the strength filters so that we can see all domains.
So here’s what we can see on average across the different cans domains or categories. We can see the life functioning, the behavioral emotional needs, the strengths ,the trauma symptoms, the caregiver areas, the risks, the child trauma traumatic exposures, the acculturation, the transitional age youth areas, and the younger child domains that are in this CANS. So you can see on average the number of items identified first, discovered and then on our last assessment by domain. We don’t see movement on trauma, but we don’t expect to because once they’re discovered that’s an exposure that will always be present. We cannot change what has happened to a person, we could only work on those symptoms related to the trauma the TSS here. So you can see we first identified two and a little over two and a half on average then another one and a half and we have addressed some of that.
The next table represents this graph in a table format so you can see by each of those categories or domains the different the average number of items that were identifying to address. So life functioning has about seven items on average per youth, five on average in behavior emotional needs, and five strengths to build on average. Toto is doing really well with the caregiver areas. And again, as we saw with Toto that addressing anxiety may be an area for growth, we see related to that maybe addressing more of those trauma symptoms is an area for coaching or growth for Toto as well.
Down below this what we see. are the narratives that go along with the waterfall dashboard and so you can see here that this helps describe that dashboard. This helps describe that dashboard and this is the waterfall chart shows that people have 25 identified items on average on the first available assessment and an additional six items are discovered sometime during the episode of care resulting in a total of 31 items so you can see if I scroll up 25 six and 30 one is what it’s describing there. So the narrative helps you walk through what is seen in the graphs and tables.
We have been looking at all of the people that Toto is helping. Let’s return to the filter and look at just one person. So here we select Tinkerbell. So let’s just focus on Tinkerbell’s needs and strengths. Okay. So now this will show us that Tinkerbell starts out with 17 needs for focus and strengths to build. We identified nine more for total of 26. She’s resolved 24 with two remaining if we want to see what those two remaining are we can see that it’s cultural stress and family are the last two remaining. We can look at that here so we can see that we identified optimism to build after the initial, living situation, medical, physical, sleep, eating disturbance, depression, anxiety and all of those which were discovered have since been resolved.
The other thing we can do with this dashboard is that we can look for everyone who has a particular identified item. So let’s say we wanted to focus on those youth with the anger control. If I select that item from the filter, the dashboard is going to limit the results to only those who were identified at one point to have anger control need. So you can see now six youth and you can see their different items first, discovered, ever, resolved and unresolved as a group.
That is the Waterfall of Items Presented, Discovered and Resolved Dashboard. I hope you have seen some ways that this presentation of assessments can help in your work!
Choose a Collaboration and unselect Lifetime Collaboration. Find out:
Choose a person from the filters and look at their assessments across the lifetime of care. Find out:
Remove the selection of any one person from the filters. Select to look at everyone across the lifetime of care, but limit the Item_Types to just Needs. Read the Narratives and find out:
View Video ScriptClose Video Script
Hi, I’m here to walk you through the additional features in P-CIS for supervisors. You should have already completed the Helper training. Supervisors have access to all of the functionality that helpers have plus additional functionality that will cover here.
Dashboard:
When supervisors log into their dashboard they can see any people they are either helping directly or who are being helped by one of the people they oversee. In the Helper table, supervisors see all the helpers they manage directly or indirectly in their manager hierarchy. They can also see any additional helpers for which they were assigned as the reviewer.
In the people table they see all of the people that they are either helping directly or who are being helped by one of the staff they oversee. The total people helping total sums up all the people they help directly or indirectly.
The needs and the strengths table also reflect all the needs and strengths for people being helped directly or indirectly, and the notifications table provides all notifications across all of those people as well.
If the supervisor picks a particular Helper from the helper table, then the supervisor can see the helper’s dashboard as if they were logged into P-CIS as that helper. This allows a supervisor to see the same information that the helper sees to help provide coaching and supervision when working with that helper. The breadcrumbs reflect that the main dashboard has been filtered to a Helper’s view. To return to the full dashboard view of all helpers and people, follow the breadcrumbs back to the dashboard or select the dashboard Module in the navigation pane.
Questionnaires Module:
Another functionality that the supervisor has is the ability to view the details of questionnaires in the questionnaires module. Supervisors have read access to the questionnaires module. They cannot make a changes or additions, but they can view the available questionnaires and their settings.
Base Questionnaires: There are base questionnaires which are identified by the word base here. Base questionnaires are questionnaires that are loaded for your organization by Opeeka. These questionnaires are the ones from Opeeka’s vast library of questionnaires that your organization has chosen to utilize in P-CIS. Base questionnaires are the originals and cannot be used for assessing people. The Org Admin must make a copy of the Base questionnaire to create a version which can be used for assessment. The Base questionnaire is are not editable and always remain here at the top in its original form as the base questionnaire.
Your organization administrator will make one or more copies of each of these questionnaires and make modifications to the reminder schedule, the alert schedule and item details as necessary. In this way, different versions of Base questionnaires can be created which include the same questions with different types of reminder schedules, alert schedules or item details.
Let’s look at an example. This CANS questionnaire has a seven-day interval reminder schedule and an alert schedule for crises. This CANS questionnaire has a 6 month interval reminder schedule and a level of care alert. These CANS questionnaires are two versions which have been copied from the same base questionnaire. You can tell because they show the same instrument.
Reminder Schedule: Expanding the reminder schedule, you can see here a diagram that helps provide an overview of the reminder settings. Assessments are due on particular days but windows of time before and after the due date allow flexibility for completing assessments on time. Assessment due windows identify when the assessments are completed on time, but they don’t restrict additional assessments from being completed. P-CIS will capture assessments outside of these windows, but identify them as late. Reminders associated with due dates help staff plan for upcoming assessments. They also remind staff to complete missed assessments. Reminders show in the notification table on the Main Dashboard and also show in the Notifications tab for people for that particular person when an assessment is upcoming, due or overdue.
In this example (7 day CANS), the Org Admin has required an initial assessment. An initial assessment is the assessment due for a person at the beginning of a collaboration or program. The window here identifies when an assessment would be on time if it was completed within one day before and one day after the start date for that person for the collaboration. The diagram depicts an example of an initial window that allows four days before and four day after, but our settings allows an initial assessment only one day before and one day after the start date for it to be on time.
The next setting identifies when the discharge assessment is due, if one is due when a person disenrolls out of a collaboration. It should be completed within one day before and one day after according to these settings.
P-CIS allows for capturing when an assessment is indicated due to a triggering event. Triggering events could be placement changes, substance use or physical emergencies or other types of unplanned events identified by your organization, which might indicate a need for re-assessment. In this example, the questionnaire identifies that assessments should be completed within one day after the triggering event.
Finally, the last setting here identifies how often the re-assessment should occur during care. In this case, the reassessment should occur every seven days, and it is allowing a one-day window before or after that seven-days for the assessment to be completed on time.
In these next reminder settings we’ve chosen to send a reminder one day in advance. To send an overdue alert on the due date. And then to send a final alert reminder when the assessment window is closed, which in our case is one day after the due date. When we think about an assessment due window, in this case an alert would be sent before the window opens, when the assessment is due, and when the assessment window closes. After an assessment window closes, the org admin has then chosen to send another reminder every one day. And that final reminder will recur three times.
Alert Schedule: The alert schedule set up by your organization administrator identifies specific combinations of questions when answered with a particular response pattern which will generate an alert. In this example, a crisis alert with the rule name of risk to self is generated when suicide risk is greater than or equal to 1 or non-suicide self Injury is greater than or equal to 2 or other self-harm is greater than or equal to 3. On this same questionnaire another alert exists for risk to others. This alert would be generated when danger to others is rated greater than or equal to 2 or anger control is rated greater than or equal to 3 or sexual aggression is rated greater than or equal to 2. These alert schedules are completely modifiable and set up by your organization administrator.
Question Details: Finally the supervisor can review the question details. The question details identify all the different questions that are part of this assessment and it identifies the property of the question: whether that question is an exposure, a strength, a need, a support need, a support resource, a circumstance, a goal or an opinion. The start and end date identify when the question was assigned to the questionnaire.
The remainder of the settings identify what behavior would be generated by each type of response. Let’s look at the question about sleep on this questionnaire. It is asking about needs related to sleep. The minimum threshold is zero, and that identifies that when sleep is rated a zero or less, that there is no need (indicated by the word “none’) to focus on this area for the person. If the option box were checked here that would allow the Helper to override the behavior and allow sleep rated with 0 to be assign as a need for Focus or need in the background. Because it’s not checked, then when sleep is rated a zero, there are no options to override the setting. In other words, there’s no ability to assign sleep as a need for Focus or a need in the background when it is rated as a zero.
The max default identifies the Threshold at which or above a need will default to a need for focus, in this case. So when sleep is rated as a 2, it is assigned as a need for Focus. The max option check mark allows the Helper to override that setting and put sleep in the background or have it as no focus at all.
The alternate default identifies when the response is between the Max and the Min. in this case. When sleep is rated between a 0 or 2, (so it is rated as a 1), then sleep would be identified as a need in the background. The alt option allows the helper to override this setting. Thus, the helper can override the default and change sleep when rated as 1 as a need for Focus or have it be no need of importance to care at all.
These settings drive the behaviors of the items based on responses so that P-CIS will build meaningful story maps, reports and insights. These default rating response behaviors are set up one time by your organization administrator but can be adjusted to move thresholds up or down to accommodate the needs for specific programs.
For example, when considering sleep for a program or collaboration which serves individuals with bipolar disorder, a lower threshold, such as a 1 or greater, might be appropriate to set for sleep to be a need for focus.
Program specific adjustment can be made by making different versions of the questionnaires and adjusting the reminder schedule, alert schedule and question details. We will see later in the Organization Administrator training how different versions of questionnaires can be assigned to collaborations to support this custom approach to care.
Settings Module: Finally, the other module that the supervisor can see when logging in is settings. Here the supervisor can see all of the helpers that they supervise. Selecting a helper will allow them to view the first, the middle, the last name of the helper, the helper’s position, title and role, the manager of the helper, phone numbers, addresses, and email. If the helper has a reviewer other than themselves, the supervisor can view who the reviewer is. At the bottom, they can see the start and end date of the helper. Only the organization administrator can modify this information.
These are the additional features that supervisors have in addition to the features that have already been described through the helper training.
View Video ScriptClose Video Script
DASHBOARD:
When Organization administrators log into P-CIS, they can see everyone who has ever been served by an agency.
Organization administrators see all of the helpers for the agency regardless of supervision.
Organization administrators are the only role that can see active and inactive people who are no longer in any active collaborations.
Inactive partners can be identified because they will have an end date in the People tables.
This means that they are no longer in any current collaboration. By sorting by end date you will see that active people have no end date and inactive people will have an end date on their primary collaborations.
QUESTIONNAIRES:
In the questionnaires tab module, Organization Administrators can not only see all questionnaires as supervisors would, but they can also create new questionnaire versions and modify existing ones. Again, as we covered in the supervisor training, there are a number of Base Questionnaires, which have been assigned to your agency by Opeeka. These are the questionnaires that your agency requested be part of your P-CIS application. These base questionnaires cannot be used to assess anyone. As the organization administrator, you must make a copy of these questionnaires or clone them in order to create versions of these questionnaires which can be used for assessment.
Add a New Questionnaire: I’m going to go ahead and create a copy of the CANS instrument, and it will ask me to confirm that I want to make a copy. When I select yes, it’ll add a new cloned questionnaire with ID. It is now called the clone of the CANS trauma comprehensive. To edit the name, I click on the Edit Questionnaire button. Two icons are visible now, a clone icon and a pencil icon.
The clone icon can be used to clone this questionnaire version into another version. This will be helpful later after I add all of the customizations to the schedules.
Right now I want to edit the name, so I click the pencil icon. I’m going to call this MY version of the CANS.
The start date is available here to identify when this version of the cans was first used. The end date identifies when the version of CANS is no longer used and you want to retire the entire version.
You can only delete questionnaire versions if they have never been used for assessment of a person. Otherwise, you can end a questionnaire, taking it out of circulation for future use.
Reminder Schedule: Now with my new version of the CANS instrument, I can create a reminder schedule. The Base Questionnaires have no reminder schedule associated with them.
To add a reminder schedule to this version, I select the edit questionnaire button. Once I’m in the edit mode for this version, I can select which reminder windows I want to set for this questionnaire.
First, I will ask myself, does this questionnaire require an initial assessment at the time when the person enrolls into a collaboration or a program? If yes, is there a window around which we would expect that assessment to be completed?
For example, I might say that I will allow an initial assessment to be 14 days before and 30 days after the start of a person’s collaboration start date.
What this means is that when a person enrolls into a program/collaboration, the system will identify if there are any available assessments for this questionnaire already in the system within the past 14 days, and it’ll check off that the initial assessment has already been done if it finds one for that person.
If there isn’t one, it’ll start the reminder schedule for the initial assessment, which states that an assessment is due within 30 days after the start or the enrollment date for that person.
P-CIS will allow the collection of the assessments outside of these windows, but it will not recognize them as on-time unless the assessment falls within the window timeframe.
Next, I can add a discharge window. This identifies that when the person is unenrolled in the collaboration, what timeframe we will allow for an assessment to qualify as a discharge assessment.
We would want to collect the discharge assessment perhaps 14 days before and 14 days after the discharge date.
This again will instigate a series of reminders for the helper to collect a discharge assessment and if one exists already, the reminder will be satisfied.
We can also add a triggering event window. This means that when there’s a triggering event, such as a placement change or emergency, or other event determined by your agency protocols, that we want to reassess with this assessment.
We’re going to indicate that we want to reassess with the CANS within three days of that triggering event.
What will happen here is that when a helper starts the Assessment and selects the reason of “Triggering Event”, P-CIS will ask for the triggering event day.
If it’s within three days after the trigger event, it would be identified as on time
Otherwise, if that triggering event day is more than three days prior to the assessment collection date entered by the Helper, then this assessment would be identified as not on time.
We also may want to collect the assessment at regular intervals.
In this example, we want to collect it every six months or every 183 days.
We enter here that we want the assessment to be completed within 30 days before and 30 days after its due date.
That would mean that according to our reminder schedule, 30 days prior to the 183rd day in the program – so on day 153 – that the assessment window would open. At 30 days after the 183rd day – on day 213 – the assessment window would close.
Reminder Frequency:
Down below here are controls for which reminders we’d like to send for the schedule above.
The first option is to send reminders in advance of the window opening for planning purposes.
We may want to let folks know five days in advance of the window opening. In this case on day 183 minus 30 days, at 153 days would be the day the window would open for the regular interval. Five days prior to that, on day 148, an alert would be sent that says the Helper has an upcoming assessment due.
We can then choose to send an due alert on the due date.
This would identify on day 183 exactly that the assessment is due.
We can send a final alert on the assessment window close day.
So even though the assessment was due on day 183, we allow up to 30 days after for it to still be on time. So on day 213, we would send a final alert to say the window is closing and the assessment will soon be late or missed.
Finally, we can send overdue alerts after the window closes, if the assessment hasn’t been completed.
We’ll send the alert every seven days after the assessment window closes.
So on day 213 a final alert will go out saying the assessment window is closed, and on day 220 an overdue alert will go out notifying the helper that the assessment was missed, and that will continue every seven days, repeating three times.
We can give this reminder schedule a name. We’ll call this Every Six Months. The name will show in the reminder schedule associated with the version.
The questionnaire version can be assigned to a collaboration in the Settings module where the Collaborations are maintained. When it is assigned to a collaboration, that means anyone enrolled in that collaboration will be subject to the reminder schedules and the alert schedules for this version of the instrument.
For example, if this questionnaire is assigned to an In-home Canine Therapy collaboration, then every youth enrolled in that this collaboration would begin having alerts according to this reminder schedule. The day that the person enrolls in the collaboration, an initial assessment would be due. If an initial assessment existed 14 days prior to their enrollment, then that reminder would be automatically resolved and no reminder alert would be generated. If the person did not have an initial assessment then a reminder would be generated according to the reminder schedule. Reminders are resolved upon initial submission of an assessment, regardless of if it is approved or returned.
Alert Schedule:
In addition to reminders, once the assessment is completed, an alert schedule can evaluate the responses on the assessment and generate risk alerts.
We will set up an alert schedule for this questionnaire by selecting Add New Schedule.
Let’s start by giving this alert an alert name. We’ll call this alert schedule: Placement Risks, and the rule level will be Risk of Placement Change.
We have the option to create both the free-form entry rule name and assign a rule level category which comes from a series of drop-down options.
The rule level options in the drop down are defined and managed by the Organization Administrator in the Settings Options.
So in this case, we’re going to call this rule Placement Substance Use and the rule level is Risk of Placement Change. This alert will identify when
substance use (mid)is greater than or equal to 1,
AND recreational (above mid) is greater than or equal to 2
AND supervision (bottom) is greater than or equal to 2.
We may feel that this combination of need may indicate that a youth in placement who has a lot of unsupervised free time, with some concerns about how the youth is spending time recreationally with some mild substance use is at risk of placement change. Our concern here is that this combination of needs could lead to greater substance use and a risk of placement change, and we want to identify this combination of needs as a risk so that it can be addressed before a placement change is indicated.
We can add a second rule which is completely separate from the first rule by selecting add new item. This one has to do with runaway behavior and caregiver knowledge. We will call this rule Placement Runaway with the same rule level of Risk of Placement Change.
So when run away (lower mid)is greater than or equal to 1
AND caregiver knowledge (bottom) is greater than or equal to 2,
then we are concerned about a risk of placement change. This risk of placement change is related to runaway behavior and a greater need of caregiver knowledge in caring for this youth.
As many rules as you want can be included in this schedule. The rules are applied as soon as the assessment is approved for a person. Once approved, P-CIS will check the responses against the rules here in the alert schedule. If any of the rules are met based on the response criteria, an alert will be generated, and it will show in the notification table as well in the person’s notification tab.
Question Details:
The question details can also be modified. We reviewed the question details for the sleep item during the supervisor training. Here we will modify the sleep question details, by selecting the pencil icon on the row for the sleep item. As discussed in the supervisor training, sleep has a minimum threshold of zero, which means when sleep is scored as a zero or below, then no options are available for sleep to be a Need for Focus or a Need in the Background.
According to our Max threshold, when sleep is scored as a two or higher, then our default for that is to have Sleep as a Need for Focus, with an option to override. Let’s go ahead and remove that option for override, and let’s adjust this to a max threshold of 1. Let’s say that we’re really focused on sleep in this particular program. It is a focus of our program, and we have a specific sleep intervention. So anytime there is a sleep concern, even mild, then an intervention is applied. Therefore, when sleep is rated as a 1 or greater, it will be a Need for Focus. We are not allowing an override, therefore this must be addressed in this program.
So now for sleep if it’s rated a zero, then there’s no issue and no focus for care. If it’s rated a one two or three, then it becomes a Need for Focus, and this cannot be changed by the helper.
The alternative default is still set to background in this case, but it doesn’t matter because there’s no value between 0 and 1. If there were a value between 0 and 1 then the alt default behavior would be applied for any value between the Min threshold and the Max threshold, in this case with an option to override. But the Alt behavior does not apply here because there are no additional values in between these two thresholds.
By adding an end date, a question can be sunset-ed from a questionnaire. What this means, is that a question that is no longer of value can be removed for future use from this version of the questionnaire, but all past responses are still present and viewable. This allows for versions to be modified over time without the need to create a separate version for minor question deletions or additions. For now, we will leave this end date blank.
We can go ahead and save our changes. The question now has updated default behavior. And the next time this version of the assessment is conducted for a person when sleep is rated as a one or greater, sleep will be identified with a hand icon as a Need for Focus, and staff will not be given the option to override that. This means that Sleep will show in the Story Map and the Family Report as a Need for Focus during care. When staff use this particular questionnaire, these behaviors will be applied.
This concludes the questionnaire portion of the organization administrator training
View Video ScriptClose Video Script
In this video we will cover managing the settings in the settings module as an organization administrator. In the settings module the organization administrator has the ability to view several tabs including Helpers, Collaborations, Options, Roles, and Admin.
HELPERS TAB
In the Helpers tab, this is where the organization administrator can manage all the users of the system. They can view details of existing users, by clicking on the link of each user. The Edit Helper button enables edit mode for managing the existing user.
To add a new user, we select Add New.